Collecting updates for webpage (KIT internal discussion)

added ⏯️ In Progress 💬 Discussion 📖 Documentation labels

assigned to @b380630

@b380630 Thanks! This is a nice basis :) I will go through the website today and tomorrow and start noting down thoughts and comments here.

Data Description

Link "Data access" leads me to the page Data Description and not to file:///home/ys2356/Atmospheric_Science/DD_RegIKlim/NUKLEUS/External_Communication/2025-03-10_FE_website/build/html/Software.html where it should lead to (?).

Overview

from my pov the word "data project" is confusing. But I see that this way it is consistent with freva databrowser.
observations should also name hyras

NUKLEUS Simulations

Would move the intro of 3x3 ensemble before the first subsection. Also introduce RCMs and GCMs explicitly here.
Later this should also at least refer to the manuscript where we describe the GCM selection (historical). [Sidenote: How to best keep track of contents to be added later on? Mention now that this will be added? Or create an issue for that?]

Model Domains and Resolution

grammar and typo: ... "that has been downsclaed" ... to ... "that were downscaled" ... [sidenote: how to correct that easily?, seems too much effort to do this via commenting here.]
EUR-11 is 12 km resolution
We should add information that ssp370 is the main scenario used in NUKLEUS and that ssp245 and ssp585 were only run for ICON (and EC-Earth as mentioned) to test the sensitivity (would then also be good to describe the sensitivity somewhere, I think Christian had looked into that.)

Currently Available Data

Simulation Domain EUR-11

I would not make the REMO Evaluation in red but orange. Otherwise this may be very confusing. The data is also there, but it is not CMORized, so I consider this also as appropriate.

Thanks @b380782 so far. I will wait for a full response until you went completely through everything.

Just one comment on your sidenote on grammar/typo etc. One option could be, that you save the webside as pdf via the printing tool. Afterwards you can use the commenting tool of a standard pdf reader and add it here as appendix. I don't have any other easy solution for that.

@b380782 @b380039 Thanks again to both of you for your comments. I have updated the pages accordingly.

However, some points are still just placeholders (e.g. a new sub-section on the two grid types) and we have to think about what kind of content we want to add.

Please feel free to make any suggestions here (e.g. as a list of bullet points) what you think is currently missing.

I have uploaded the updated files again to /work/bb1203/b380630_ehmele/share/ Into the same folder I also uploaded the figure separately.

Regarding your comment on "How to best keep track of contents to be added later on", we can add placeholders on the pages marked in any color like "further information will follow" or we can also create a separate issue for such content For me both would be fine. The first solution would indicate publicly that there is more information to come.

And although we are currently mainly working on the "data description" part, we should keep an eye on the other pages as well.

I have a few remarks regarding the bias corrected data, which we should update before making this available to avoid expectations, which we will never fulfill:

Currently, there is no plan to provide bias corrected EUR-11 simulations. Therefore, I would remove the corresponding section "Simulation Domain EUR-11i"
I would rename the section "Currently Available Bias-corrected Data" to "Bias-corrected Data"
We should clearly state, that we agreed to bias correct and make available tas, tasmin, tasmax, pr for daily frequency for all historical and ssp-370 CEU-3 simulations, i.e. 3 x 3 x 3 = 27 simulations.
I would put a note that we plan to make the bias corrected data available during the first half of 2025.